|
Post by arfanho7 on Feb 22, 2024 3:03:18 GMT -5
So you could predict somebody’s salary based on the number of years they were out the points they had the rebounds. The correlation was ridiculously high. So here’s a perfect arbitrage situation I pay you for your individual performance but your team performance matters wildly. So I’m going to go find people who don’t have good individual performance as a first get and great team performance and get them for what turns out to be a bargain. Shane Battier was one of the best team players of all time. even though he was paid well was that he wasn’t paid as a superstar. And he was a superstar team performer. BK What’s interesting about that is it’s completely counter to the way most people think about how you build a championship team. You go find America Cell Phone Number List champions. You go find people who perform great individually. But here he’s looking at the team chemistry. He’s working within the economic confines of how you pay. Can you talk a little bit about those limitations FF Yes. The first thing is everyone who is not in basketball thinks is the way to build a championship team is to put together a bunch of stars. I don’t know a single basketball player who thinks the way to do it is to put together all stars because there’s only one ball and there’s a lot of work to be done on the court. The economic situation is that not everyone has the same budget for a whole bunch of media reasons and because of how much any individual group of owners is going to invest and if you’re in a small market or a big market.
|
|